by Paul Craig Roberts
Washington has been at war for 12 years. According to
experts such as Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes, these wars have cost
Americans approximately $6 trillion, enough to keep Social Security and
Medicare sound for years. All there is to show for 12 years of war is fat bank
balances for the armament industries and a list of destroyed countries with
millions of dead and dislocated people who never lifted a hand against the
United States.
The cost paid by American troops and taxpayers is extreme.
Secretary of Veteran Affairs Erik Shinseki reported in November 2009 that “more
veterans have committed suicide since 2001 than we have lost on the battlefields
of Iraq and Afghanistan.” Many thousands of our troops have suffered
amputations and traumatic brain injuries. At the Marine Corps War College Jim
Lacey calculated that the annual cost of the Afghan war was $1.5 billion for
each al-Qaeda member in Afghanistan. Many US and coalition troops paid with
their lives for every one al-Qaeda member killed. On no basis has the war ever
made sense.
Washington’s wars have destroyed the favorable image of the
United States created over the decades of the cold war. No longer the hope of
mankind, the US today is viewed as a threat whose government cannot be trusted.
The wars that have left America’s reputation in tatters are the consequence of 9/11. The neoconservatives who advocate America’s hegemony over the world called for “a new Pearl Harbor” that would allow them to launch wars of conquest. Their plan for conquering the Middle East as their starting point was set out in the neoconservative “Project for the New American Century.” It was stated clearly by Commentary editor Norman Podhoretz and also by many neoconservatives.
The neocon argument boils down to a claim that history has
chosen “democratic capitalism” and not Karl Marx as the future. To comply with
history’s choice, the US must beef up its military and impose the American Way
on the entire world.
In other words, as Claes Ryn wrote, the American
neoconservatives are the “new Jacobins,” a reference to the French Revolution
of 1789 that intended to overthrow aristocratic Europe and replace it with
“Liberty, equality, fraternity,” but instead gave Europe a quarter century of
war, death, and destruction.
Ideologies are dangerous, because they are immune to facts.
Now that the United States is no longer governed by the US Constitution, but by
a crazed ideology that has given rise to a domestic police state more complete
than that of Communist East Germany and to a warfare state that attacks
sovereign countries based on nothing but manufactured lies, we are left with
the irony that Russia and China are viewed as constraints on Washington’s
ability to inflict evil, death, and destruction on the world.
The two pariah states of the 20th century have become the
hope of mankind in the 21st century!
As Oliver Stone and Peter Kuznick prove in their book, The
Untold History of the United States, the American government has never deserved
its white hat reputation. Washington has been very successful in dressing up
its crimes in moralistic language and hiding them in secrecy. It is only
decades after events that the truth comes out.
For example, on August 19, 1953, the democratically elected
government of Iran was overthrown by a coup instigated by the US government.
Sixty years after the event declassified CIA documents detail how the secret
CIA operation overthrew a democratic government and imposed Washington’s puppet
on the people of Iran.
The declassified documents could not have spelled it out any
clearer: “The military coup that overthrew Mossadeq and his National Front
cabinet was carried out under CIA direction as an act of U.S. foreign policy,
conceived and approved at the highest levels of government.” http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/19/politics/cia-iran-1953-coup
In the 21st century Washington is attempting to repeat its
1953 feat of overthrowing the Iranian government, this time using the faux
“green revolution” financed by Washington.
When that fails, Washington will rely on military action.
If 60 years is the time that must pass before Washington’s
crimes can be acknowledged, the US government will admit the truth about
September 11, 2001 on September 11, 2061. In 2013, on this 12th anniversary of
9/11, we only have 48 years to go before Washington admits the truth. Alas, the
members of the 9/11 truth movement will not still be alive to receive their
vindication.
But just as it has been known for decades that Washington
overthrew Mossadeq, we already know that the official story of 9/11 is hogwash.
No evidence exists that supports the government’s 9/11
story. The 9/11 Commission was a political gathering run by a neoconservative
White House operative. The Commission members sat and listened to the
government’s story and wrote it down. No investigation of any kind was made.
One member of the Commission resigned, saying that the fix was in. After the
report was published, both co-chairmen of the Commission and the legal counsel
wrote books disassociating themselves from the report. The 9/11 Commission was
“set up to fail,” they wrote.
NIST’s account of the structural failure of the twin towers
is a computer simulation based on assumptions chosen to produce the result.
NIST refuses to release its make-believe explanation for expert scrutiny. The
reason is obvious. NIST’s explanation of the structural failure of the towers
cannot survive scrutiny.
There are many 9/11 Truth organizations whose members are
high-rise architects, structural engineers, physicists, chemists and nano-chemists, military and
civilian airline pilots, firemen and first responders, former prominent
government officials, and 9/11 families. The evidence they have amassed
overwhelms the feeble official account.
It has been proven conclusively that World Trade Center
Building 7 fell at free fall which can only be achieved by controlled
demolition that removes all resistance below to debris falling from above so
that no time is lost in overcoming resistance from intact structures. NIST has
acknowledged this fact, but has not changed its story.
In other words, still in America today official denial takes
precedence over science and
known undisputed facts.
known undisputed facts.
On this 12th anniversary of a false flag event, it is
unnecessary for me to report the voluminous evidence that conclusively proves
that the official story is a lie. You can read it for yourself. It is available
online. You can read what the architects and engineers have to say. You can
read the scientists’ reports. You can hear from the first responders who were
in the WTC towers. You can read the pilots who say that the maneuvers
associated with the airliner that allegedly hit the Pentagon are beyond their
skills and most certainly were not performed by inexperienced pilots.
You can read David Griffin’s many books. You can watch the
film produced by Richard Gage and Architects & Engineers for 9/11 truth.
You can read the 9/11 Toronto Report, International Hearings on 9/11. http://www.amazon.com/9-11-Toronto-Report/dp/1478369205/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1376960447&sr=1-1&keywords=The+Toronto+Report You
can read this book: http://www.international.to/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9319:hijacking-americas-mind-on-911-counterfeiting-evidence&catid=66:oped&Itemid=151
Actually, you do not need any of the expert evidence to know
that the US government’s story is false. As I have previously pointed out, had
a few young Saudi Arabians, the alleged 9/11 hijackers, been capable of
outwitting, without support from any government and intelligence service, not
only the CIA and FBI, but all sixteen US intelligence services, the
intelligence services of Washington’s NATO allies and Israel’s Mossad, the
National Security Council, NORAD, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Traffic
Control, and defeat Airport Security four times in one hour on the same
morning, the White House, Congress, and the media would have been demanding an
investigation of how the National Security State could so totally fail.
Instead, the President of the United States and every
government office fiercely resisted any investigation. It was only after a year
of demands and rising pressure from the 9/11 families that the 9/11 Commission
was created to bury the issue.
No one in government was held accountable for the astonishing
failure. The national security state was defeated by a few rag tag Muslims with
box cutters and a sick old man dying from renal failure while holed up in a
cave in Afghanistan, and no heads rolled.
The total absence from the government for demands for an
investigation of an event that is the greatest embarrassment to a “superpower”
in world history is a complete give-away that 9/11was a false flag event. The
government did not want any investigation, because the government’s cover story
cannot stand investigation.
The government could rely on the mega-media corporations in
whose hands the corrupt Clinton regime concentrated the US media. By supporting
rather than investigating the government’s cover story, the media left the
majority of Americans, who are sensitive to peer pressure, without any support
for their doubts. Effectively, the American Ministry of Propaganda validated
the government’s false story.
Common everyday experiences of Americans refute the
government’s story. Consider, for example, self-cleaning ovens. How many
American homes have them? Thirty million? More? Do you have one?
Do you know what temperature self-cleaning ovens reach? The
self-cleaning cycle runs for several hours at 900 degrees Fahrenheit or 482
degrees Celsius. Does your self-cleaning oven melt at 482 degrees Celsius. No,
it doesn’t. Does the very thin, one-eighth inch steel soften and your oven
collapse? No, it doesn’t.
Keep that in mind while you read this: According to tests
performed by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), only 2% of
the WTC steel tested by NIST reached temperatures as high as 250 degrees
Celsius, about half the temperature reached by your self-cleaning oven. Do you
believe that such low temperatures on such small areas of the WTC towers caused
the massive, thick, steel columns in the towers to soften and permit the
collapse of the buildings? If you do, please explain why your self-cleaning
oven doesn’t weaken and collapse.
In Section E.5 of the Executive Summary in this NIST reporthttp://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=101019 it
says: “A method was developed using microscopic observations of paint cracking
to determine whether steel members had experienced temperatures in excess of
250 degrees C. More than 170 areas were examined . . . Only three locations had
a positive result indicating that the steel and paint may have reached
temperatures in excess of 250 degrees C.” Analysis of steel “microstructures
show no evidence of exposure to temperatures above 600 degrees C for any
significant time.”
In section 3.6 of the NIST report http://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=860495 NIST
states: “NIST believes that this collection of steel from the WTC towers is
adequate for purposes of the investigation.”
How did these truths get out? My explanation is that the
NIST scientists, resentful of the threat to their jobs and future employment
opportunities and chaffing under the order to produce a false report, revealed
the coerced deception by including information that their political masters did
not understand. By stating unequivocally the actual temperatures, NIST’s scientists
put the lie to the coerced report.
The melting point of steel is around 1,500 degrees C. or
2,600 degrees F. Steel can lose strength at lower temperatures, but the NIST
scientists reported that only a small part of the steel was even subjected to
moderate temperatures less than those obtained by the self-cleaning oven in
your home.
If you need to think about this a bit more, obtain a copy of
The Making of the Atomic Bomb by Richard Rhodes. Have a look at the streetcar
in photo 108. The caption reads: “The Hiroshima fireball instantly raised
surface temperatures within a mile of the hypocenter well above 1,000 degrees
F.” Is the streetcar a melted lump of steel? No, it is structurally intact,
although blackened with burnt paint.
Washington would have you believe that steel that survived
intact the atomic bomb would melt from low temperature, short lived, isolated
office fires. What do you think of a government that believes that you are that
stupid?
Who would support a government that lies every time it opens
its mouth?
The three WTC buildings that were destroyed were massive
heat sinks. I doubt that the limited, short-lived, low temperature fires in the buildings even warmed
the massive steel structures to the touch.
Moreover, not a single steel column melted or deformed from
softening. The columns were severed at specific lengths by extremely high temperature charges placed
on the columns.
On this 12th anniversary of 9/11, ask yourself if you really
want to believe that temperatures half those reached by your self-cleaning oven
caused three massive steel structures to crumble into dust.
Then ask yourself why your government thinks you are so
totally stupid as to believe such a fairy tale as your government has told you
about 9/11.
About Dr. Paul Craig Roberts:
Paul Craig Roberts was
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of
the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard
News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments.
His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. His latest book, The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic
Dissolution of the West is now available.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I want to hear from you but any comment that advocates violence, illegal activity or that contains advertisements that do not promote activism or awareness, will be deleted.