If you missed the discussion on Monday,
03-12-2012 on Breaking Taboo,
7:00 PM EST - Newdissidentradio.com you can listen to it HERE
Testing is a part of every student’s life from athletics to
scholastics. In the latter case, children and young adults are tested to
determine their performance and retention of course information. These
tests are necessary to gauge in what area a student needs work in order to
enhance their education. To ensure that the students are achieving
the desired level of minimum educationn, in 2001, No Child Left Behind was
passed into Law requiring that schools test students in public
schools. In America ’s
educational system today though, the testing process has taken a turn for the
worse, turning it into a performance-based institution rather than one which is
meant to stimulate intellectual prowess. This attempt to reform education
seemed harmless enough at first but when the reality of its implications began
to set in, many quickly realized how errant a policy it was.
As Anton Batey has stated,
“At first glance, the concept of standardized tests seems reasonable. Children
should be tested, and the tests are clear indicators either of how intelligent
they are, or of how much the school is teaching them. But what is the school
"teaching" them, exactly? The answer is simple but unfortunate:
They're teaching them how to take the test.” Testing is important
but when school administrators and teachers are given the sole task of ensuring
their students perform well else risk losing Federal funding or even, their
jobs, it only opens the door to fraudulent recording of scores, purposefully
omitting “special needs” students and dismissing all extracurricular efforts
only to appear as successful in their educational methodology.
Part of the issue with this
testing method is in it’s determination of “how intelligent a child is”.
When the child’s results, which may be recorded as poor; directly attributable
to their low performing school, are posted publicly as required under this Law,
the affects on a child’s confidence and future potential, can be extremely
destructive. But this is not the only test that can be detrimental in this
manner. Intelligence, personality and career testing all attempt to
assist young people in finding their place in our society but these
measurements may also negatively affect their self-image. While a child may be
incredibly artistic they could fail in reading or mathematics or be assigned a
low I.Q. and as determined by these tests, could very well be “left behind” as
a failure in their own minds, taking from them any hope for success.
The question becomes then;
is teaching our children to be performers as opposed to thinkers detrimental
and is this approach diminishing the true purpose of education; that of
empowerment. By using our children as gauges as opposed to encouraging free thinking, future leaders, we are doing more harm than good to not only their futures
but our collective society’s. What we all should be asking ourselves is:
Are we empowering our children and feeding their potential, inner genii or are
we handicapping them in an inane effort to simply adhere to an errant, short
term philosophy; doing more harm to them than good?
No comments:
Post a Comment
I want to hear from you but any comment that advocates violence, illegal activity or that contains advertisements that do not promote activism or awareness, will be deleted.