Republican
Ron Paul is the only presidential candidate of either party to tell the truth
that America
is “slipping into a fascist system.”
That is
unquestionably the critical issue of the hour for the United States of America
and one that Paul’s Republican fellow candidates and their Democratic opponent
President Obama choose to ignore.
Hand in
hand with this existential crisis is that a nation that goes fascist at home
invariably becomes a tyrant abroad. Thus, the Congressman from Galveston
is right on the mark when he calls for the predatory U.S.
to pull its troops out of the Middle East and Africa
and close down its foreign bases. The U.S. , indisputably, with its 1,000
military bases at home and a thousand more abroad, is now the most
awesome military power ever.
“We’ve
slipped away from a true Republic,” Paul told a cheering crowd of followers at
a Feb. 18th rally in Kansas City ,
Mo. “Now we’re slipping into a
fascist system where it’s a combination of government and big business and
authoritarian rule and the suppression of the individual rights of each and
every American citizen.”
When Obama
signed the National Defense Authorization Act(NDAA) into law last New Year’s
Eve he pledged he would not subject citizens to indefinite military detention
without trial. Yet if Mr. Obama should change his mind, who lives free and who
is shackled behind bars is up to him, not to any legal system. The rights
guaranteed in the Constitution are worth zero to a person who can be imprisoned
indefinitely on Mr. Obama’s say-so.
Ralph
Munyan, a Republican committeeman who attended the Paul rally, told AP he
agreed with Paul’s warnings of a “fascist system” and Paul’s pledges to end the
War on Drugs as well as U.S.
involvement in wars overseas. By contrast, candidates Mitt Romney, Rick
Santorum, and Newt Gingrich are all hawks spoiling for a fight with Iran and who
leave peace-minded Republican voters no one to turn to save Paul.
An article
on Paul published in the Feb. 27th issue of “The New Yorker” quotes him
as saying, “We thought Obama might help us and get us out of some of these
messes. But now we’re in more countries than ever---we can’t even keep track of
how many places our troops are!”
In the
evaluation of “New Yorker” reporter Kelefa Sanneh, “So far, the Paul
campaign is neither a groundswell nor a failure. He is slowly collecting
delegates...” which could impact the final selection of the nominee even if
they do not have the strength to nominate Paul.
Overall,
Paul’s message appears to be “doing better, state by state, than he did in
2008,” Sanneh writes, but “he has conspicuously failed to establish himself as
this year’s Tea Party candidate.”
“People
don’t think of Paul as a top-tier Republican candidate partly because they
think of him as a libertarian: anti-tax and anti-bailout, but also antiwar,
anti-empire, and, sometimes, anti-Republican,” Sanneh continues.
To date,
Paul’s shining contribution to the 2012 campaign is educational---even if the
major networks and cable powerhouse Fox News downplay his candidacy in their
primary night election coverage. Some of what he says gets through to the
public, particularly youthful voters. On the grave issues of totalitarianism at
home and tyranny abroad, Paul is the last truth-teller. As such, Paul is a dove
fighting for survival among a flock of hawks, and his chances are not bright. #
(Sherwood
Ross heads a public relations firm for political candidates who favor peace and
prosperity. Reach him at sherwoodross10@gmail.com.)
No comments:
Post a Comment
I want to hear from you but any comment that advocates violence, illegal activity or that contains advertisements that do not promote activism or awareness, will be deleted.