We’ve already made our
choice for the best headline of the year, so far: “Citigroup Replaces
JPMorgan as White House Chief of Staff."
When we saw it on the website Gawker.com we had to smile, but the smile didn’t last long. There’s simply too much truth in that headline; it says a lot about how Wall Street and Washington have colluded to create the winner-take-all economy that rewards the very few at the expense of everyone else.
When we saw it on the website Gawker.com we had to smile, but the smile didn’t last long. There’s simply too much truth in that headline; it says a lot about how Wall Street and Washington have colluded to create the winner-take-all economy that rewards the very few at the expense of everyone else.
The story behind it is that
Jack Lew is President Obama’s new chief of staff — arguably the most powerful
office in the White House that isn’t shaped like an oval. He used to work for
the giant banking conglomerate Citigroup. His predecessor as chief of staff is
Bill Daley, who used to work at the giant banking conglomerate JPMorgan Chase,
where he was maestro of the bank’s global lobbying and chief liaison to the
White House. Daley replaced Obama’s first chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, who
once worked as a rainmaker for the investment bank now known as Wasserstein
& Company, where in less than three years he was paid a reported eighteen
and a half million dollars.
Still with us? It’s
startling the number of high-ranking Obama officials who have spun through the
revolving door between the White House and the sacred halls of investment banking.
Sure, you can argue that it makes sense that the chief executive of the nation
would look to other executives for the expertise you need to build back from
the disastrous collapse of the banks in the final year of the Bush
Administration. Remember — it was Bush and Cheney with their cronies in big
business who helped walk us right into the blast furnace of financial meltdown,
then rushed to save the banks with taxpayer money. That little fact seems to
have been overlooked in the current primaries.
All this brings back
memories of Hank Paulson, doesn’t it? Hank Paulson, the $700 million man who
became secretary of the treasury for President Bush. Paulson had been head of
Goldman Sachs, the rich investment bank. As his successor at Goldman Sachs,
Paulson chose Lloyd Blankfein. Several times, according to Bloomberg News,
Rolling Stone, and Paulson’s own memoir, the treasury secretary made sure
Blankfein and Goldman got privileged inside information.
But Bush and Cheney aren’t
the only ones to have a soft spot for financiers. President Obama may call
bankers “fat cats” and stir the rabble against them with populist rhetoric when
it serves his interest, but after the fiscal fiasco, he allowed the culprits to
escape virtually scot-free. When he’s in New
York he dines with them frequently and eagerly
accepts their big contributions. Like his predecessors, his administration also
has provided them with billions of taxpayer dollars – low-cost money that they
used for high-yielding investments to make big profits. The largest banks are
bigger than they were when he took office and earned more in the first
two-and-a-half years of his term than they did during the entire eight years of
the Bush administration. That’s confirmed by industry data.
And get this. It turns out,
according to The
New York Times, that as President Obama’s inner circle has been
shrinking, his “rare new best friend” is Robert Wolf. They play basketball,
golf, and talk economics when Wolf is not raising money for the president’s
campaign.
Robert Wolf runs the U.S.
branch of the giant Swiss bank UBS, which participated in schemes to help rich
Americans evade their taxes. During hearings in 2009, Michigan’s Senator Carl
Levin, chairman of the permanent subcommittee on investigations, described some of the tricks
used by UBS: “Swiss bankers aided and abetted violations of U.S. tax law by
traveling to this country with client code names, encrypted computers, counter-
surveillance training, and all the rest of it, to enable U.S. residents to hide
assets and money in Swiss accounts.
“The bankers then returned
to Switzerland
and treated their conduct as blameless since Swiss law says tax evasion is no
crime. The Swiss bank before us deliberately entered United
States , actively sought U.S.
clients and secretly helped those U.S.
clients defraud the United
States of America .”
And so it goes, the
revolving door between government service and big money in the private sector
spinning so fast it becomes an irresistible force hurling politics and high
finance together so completely it’s impossible to tell one from the other.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I want to hear from you but any comment that advocates violence, illegal activity or that contains advertisements that do not promote activism or awareness, will be deleted.