S. Paul note: For so long in this nation's history, we Americans have been told that we needed to become educated in order to compete in a market-based economy. Little did we realize that an entire student loan-shark scheme was to develop from this push to profit from our desire for self improvement. Congress has backed the measures of governmental loans and corporate favors for the likes of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac only to put the screws to those of us who wanted better from this life. When all is said and done and the piece of paper hangs on our walls collecting dust, this education has only served to put us further into debt while the few profit from another example of this, our American, capitalistic nightmare.
With the spurring personal debt level in theUS
and the consumers defaulting on their loan obligations, the debt collectors are
having their gala time disturbing the consumers, debtors and the defaulted
student borrowers and asking them for recuperation of the money that they owe
to the debtors. However, the deceptive practices of the debt collectors are
getting on the nerves of the debtors and this is the most prominent reason
behind the increasing complaints against the debt collectors with the Federal
Trade Commission.
When the students are unable to repay their debt through professional services, they start defaulting on the obligations and their accounts are being henceforth turned down to the collection agencies. But after the FTC submitted its FDCPA report to the Congress, can the students be safer and protected?
With the spurring personal debt level in the
When the students are unable to repay their debt through professional services, they start defaulting on the obligations and their accounts are being henceforth turned down to the collection agencies. But after the FTC submitted its FDCPA report to the Congress, can the students be safer and protected?
The data that is available
in the 2011 report shows that the FTC received the highest number of complaints
as compared to any other industry. This agency received 142.076 complaints
against the debt collection agents in 2010 and this figure was up by 119.630
complaints in 2009. The complaints were broken into different categories. Have
a look at some of them.
- Continuing to contact the debtor even after a
cease and desist request – 9.5%
- Failing to provide a verification of the debts –
12%
- Communicating with third parties in spite of
requests – 12.5%
- Calling at the employment space of the consumer
– 14%
- Threatening the consumers and using abusive
language – 21%
- Failing to send the required notifications about
the account – 26.8%
- Demanding a larger amount than what is actually
owed – 32%
- Verbally harassing the consumers – 47%
This above mentioned report
brought an immediate response from the ACA or the American Credit and
Collection Professionals and that they agree with the FTC regarding the
importance of consumer protection from the shady debt collectors who often
engage in abusive collection practices. Violation of the rules of the FDCPA
should be made stricter if there is any hope to be expected for the debtors,
especially for the student debtors.
If an investigation reveals
an FDCPA violation, how does the FTC react and take steps to stop such
activities? The FTC can either file a lawsuit with the help of the personal
attorneys in the federal court seeking permanent injunctive relief from the
harassing debt collection calls or ask for compensation for the consumers.
The Congress has always
taken solid steps to safeguard the right of the consumers and the debtors and
after the issuing of the 33rd Annual report of the FDCPA, it is
again expected that the Congress, in amalgamation with the FTC will take some
more stringent measures to punish those debt collectors who are harassing the
students and the normal consumers.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I want to hear from you but any comment that advocates violence, illegal activity or that contains advertisements that do not promote activism or awareness, will be deleted.