by David Sirota
"Let's hope the fiscal crisis doesn't get better too
soon. It'll slow down reform." -- Tom Watkins, a consultant,
summarizes the corporate education reform movement's current strategy to the
Sunday New York Times.
The Shock Doctrine, as articulated by journalist Naomi Klein,
describes the process by which corporate interests use catastrophes as
instruments to maximize their profit. Sometimes the events they use are natural
(earthquakes), sometimes they are human-created (the 9/11 attacks) and
sometimes they are a bit of both (hurricanes made stronger by human-intensified
global climate change). Regardless of the particular cataclysm, though, the
Shock Doctrine suggests that in the aftermath of a calamity, there is always
corporate method in the smoldering madness - a method based in Disaster
Capitalism.
Though Klein's book provides much evidence of the Shock
Doctrine, the Disaster Capitalists rarely come out and acknowledge their
strategy. That's why Watkins' outburst of candor, buried in this front-page New York Times article, is so important: It
shows that the recession and its corresponding shock to school budgets is
being used by corporations to maximize revenues, all under the gauzy
banner of "reform."
Some background: The Times piece follows a recent Education Week report showing that as U.S. school
systems are laying off teachers, letting schoolhouses crumble, and increasing
class sizes, high-tech firms are hitting the public-subsidy jackpot thanks to
corporate "reformers'" successful push for more
"data-driven" standardized tests (more on that in a second) and more
technology in the classrooms. Essentially, as the overall spending pie for
public schools is shrinking, the piece of the pie for high-tech companies --
who make big campaign contributions to education policymakers -- is getting
much bigger, while the piece of the pie for traditional education (teachers,
school infrastructure, text books, etc.) is getting smaller.
The Times on Sunday added some key -- and somehow, largely
overlooked -- context to this reportage: namely, that the spending shift isn't
producing better achievement results on the very standardized tests the
high-tech industry celebrates and makes money off of. "In a
nutshell," reports the Times, "schools are spending billions on
technology, even as they cut budgets and lay off teachers, with little proof
that this approach is improving basic learning."
The paper adds that the successful "pressure to push
technology into the classroom without proof of its value has deep roots"
going back more than a decade, which raises the fundamental question: Why? Why
would this push be so successful in changing education policy if there is
little hard evidence that it is the right move to improve student achievement?
The answer goes back -- as it so often does -- to corporate
power and the Shock Doctrine.
Tech companies give the politicians who set education policy
lots of campaign contributions, and in exchange, those politicians have
returned the favor by citing tough economic times over the last decade as a
rationale to wage an aggressive attack on traditional public education. That
attack has included everything from demonizing teachers; to siphoning public
money to privately administered schools; to funneling more of the money still
left in public schools to private high-tech companies.
This trend is no accidental convergence of economic disaster
and high-minded policy. On the contrary, it is a deliberate strategy by
corporate executives and their political puppets, a strategy that uses the
disaster of recession-era budget cuts as a means of justifying radical
policies, knowing that the disaster will have shellshocked observers asking far
fewer questions about data and actual results. As the Times sums it up,
the recession's "resource squeeze presents an opportunity" for
corporate interests.
Or as Watkins explains, social pain is an opportunity:
"Let's hope the fiscal crisis doesn't get better too soon. It'll slow down
reform."
For sheer weapons-grade assholishness, Watkins' publicly
wishing for a crushing recession to continue ranks up there with such gems as "bring
them on" and "let them eat cake."
However, the real news here is that a Disaster Capitalist
has spoken the unspoken and clearly articulated the Shock Doctrine in all its
hideous glory. In this case, he has told us what the "reform"
movement to demonize teachers, undermine public education, and generate private
profits from public schools is really all about: It is about using the shock of
a fiscal crisis to enact a radical, unproven but highly profitable agenda that
corporate forces fully know they cannot pass under non-emergency circumstances,
when objective scrutiny would be much more intense. Indeed, corporate
"reformers"are so reliant on the Shock Doctrine to glaze over
uncomfortable questions about their agenda, that they are now praying that the
shock of recession continues.
The Times article does a good job of raising questions,
forcing the corporate "reform" movement to resort to a revealing kind
of hypocrisy. Check out the response from the Obama administration -- which has
been one of the leaders of the corporate "reform" movement -- when
confronted with data showing that its push for technology isn't raising student
achievement:
Karen Cator, director of the
office of educational technology in the United States Department of Education,
said standardized test scores were an inadequate measure of the value of
technology in schools. Ms. Cator, a former executive at Apple Computer, said
that better measurement tools were needed but, in the meantime, schools knew
what students needed.
"In places where we've had a
large implementing of technology and scores are flat, I see that as
great," she said. "Test scores are the same, but look at all the
other things students are doing: learning to use the Internet to research,
learning to organize their work, learning to use professional writing tools,
learning to collaborate with others." (emphasis added)
Cator, of course, is making the argument that supporters of
traditional public education have been making against corporate
"reformers" for years -- namely, that standardized tests cannot be
the primary tool to measure overall educational achievement, because they do
not measure other equally important skills. And the fact that she is
selectively making it in defense of her former technology industry tells us a
lot about how public policy is really made in America
Recall that this statement against standardized testing
comes from the same Obama administration that has been pushing for more standardized
testing -- the same Obama administration that wants to use
standardized testing as a key metric for withholding federal aid from
"failing" schools and for firing teachers. That's right, somehow,
according to the Obama administration, standardized tests are the perfect tool
to judge and punish struggling schools and the teachers who work with
low-income kids, but they can't be used to similarly judge technology products
that are making Obama's high-tech donors lots of cash.
In this oxymoron, we see who the corporate
"reformers" in government really believe they work for, and whom they
shape public policy on behalf of. It's not the average parent or student or
voter. It's the Disaster Capitalists, who now have their sights set on your
local schoolhouse.
Note: Steven Brill, the author of the new book
"Class Warfare," and Dana Goldstein, the Nation magazine's education
reporter, will be debating these and other education issues on my KKZN-AM760
radio show at 9 a.m. ET on Sept. 7. Stream it live or podcast it at sirota.am760.net.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I want to hear from you but any comment that advocates violence, illegal activity or that contains advertisements that do not promote activism or awareness, will be deleted.