While Texas has some of the nation’s toughest
restrictions on reproductive health care, it has also drastically cut funding
to family planning centers. At the same time the state has increased funding to
so-called crisis pregnancy centers (CPC), which has decreased the access women
have to reproductive health care in the state. In Rick Perry’s Texas , women are not
trusted to make their own reproductive health care decisions.
As
the Texas Tribune reported, the Texas Legislature cut $73.6 million
from the Department of State Health Services budget for family planning
programs. The budget for family planning went from $111.5 million from 2010-11
to $37.9 million for 2012-13. According to the DSHS own reports the funding
cuts will cause a reduction of 180,000 client out of 220,000 that receive
family planning services. The
Legislative Budget Board estimates that the cuts could lead to
20,500 additional births.
Dorothy Reno, Director of
Clinics of Planned Parenthood of the Texas Capital Region, explains below in an
interview with Thanh Tan of the Texas Tribune what effect the cuts in family
planning will have on Texas
women. These effects could include women not detecting breast or cervical
cancer until the later stages, or not detecting a sexual transmitted disease
(STD) until after transmission to a sexual partner or it having an effect on
their fertility.
When taken in the context of
a legislative session that saw the Texas budget slashed, especially in areas
such as health and human services, it is easy to consider the move to cut
family planning as part of a general program of austerity. Except that while
the legislature was cutting funds to provide low income women in Texas with
access to basic reproductive health care, it was increasing funding for
ideological driven CPC’s.
According
to reporting by the Texas Tribune, the legislature increased the budget
of the Alternatives to Abortion program by $300,000. The $8.3 million budget
for the program goes to fund Texas Pregnancy Care Network (TPCN), a nonprofit
organization that contracts with the Texas Health and Human Services
Commission. These funds fund CPC’s, adoption agencies, social service agencies
and maternity homes. While the legislature cut funds for women’s reproductive
health care, it increased funds for a program that has been a public policy
failure.
As
the Texas Independent reported, the data shows that by any measure the
Alterative to Abortion program has not met its goals and policy objectives.
While the state funded family planning programs served approximately 220,000
women annually, the Alternatives to Abortion program only serves 18,000. In
2010, the program fell nearly 20% short of its projected client goal but was
rewarded a 60% budget increase in 2009. The program also funnels funds to urban
areas while ignoring rural areas that have less access to health care.
Not only are COC’s a policy
failure – but they are Constitutional failure as well. Investigative reporting
by the Texas Independent shows that CPC’s “routinely blur the line between
counseling and religious proselytizing.” This investigation shows that TPCN’s
own documents of inspections showed a failure to label and separate “spiritual
materials from its education materials.” The investigation also showed that
volunteers are told to invoked God when clients want an abortion and to “tell
them to trust God, he’s got a bigger plan.”
While conflating religion
and medical information, CPC’s has also been found to provide misleading and
false information. A
federal report commissioned by U.S. Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA)
showed that “federally funded ‘pregnancy resource centers’ are incorrectly
telling women that abortion results in an increased risk of breast cancer,
infertility and deep psychological trauma.” The report found that 20 of 23
federally funded centers told clients misleading or false information about
abortion, including the dubious assertion that there is a link between abortion
and breast cancer.
The NARAL Pro-Choice Texas
Foundation laid
out the failures of the Alternatives to Abortionprogram in a report
earlier this year. “The Alternatives to Abortion program provides no
recommended health services, does nothing to reduce the rate of unintended
pregnancy (and thus the need for abortion), and uses millions of taxpayer
dollars to fund a limited network of controversial, unlicensed, and unregulated
social service providers.”
At a time when America is
facing the greatest economic downturn since the Great Depression, when poverty
rates in Texas are rising, and the uninsured rate in Texas is the highest in
the nation, the Republican dominated Texas legislature cut funding for programs
prove to helping working women while increasing funding for religious
organizations that do nothing for women’s health care.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I want to hear from you but any comment that advocates violence, illegal activity or that contains advertisements that do not promote activism or awareness, will be deleted.